help buttonhome buttonBiophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH SEARCH RESULT

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by André, I.
Right arrow Articles by Linse, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by André, I.
Right arrow Articles by Linse, S.
Biophysical Journal 87:1929-1938 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

The Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Calmodulin-Peptide Complex Formation

Ingemar André *, Tõnu Kesvatera * {dagger}, Bo Jönsson §, Karin S. Åkerfeldt {ddagger} and Sara Linse *

* Department of Biophysical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Center, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden; {dagger} Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; {ddagger} Department of Chemistry, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 USA; and § Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Center, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Ingemar André, Tel: 46-46-222 8238; Fax: 46-46-2224543; E-mail: ingemar.andre{at}bpc.lu.se .

The complex between calmodulin and the calmodulin-binding portion of smMLCKp has been studied. Electrostatic interactions have been anticipated to be important in this system where a strongly negative protein binds a peptide with high positive charge. Electrostatic interactions were probed by varying the pH in the range from 4 to 11 and by charge deletions in CaM and smMLCKp. The change in net charge of CaM from ~–5 at pH 4.5 to –15 at pH 7.5 leaves the binding constant virtually unchanged. The affinity was also unaffected by mutations in CaM and charge substitutions in the peptide. The insensitivity of the binding constant to pH may seem surprising, but it is a consequence of the high charge on both protein and peptide. At low pH it is further attenuated by a charge regulation mechanism. That is, the protein releases a number of protons when binding the positively charged peptide. We speculate that the role of electrostatic interactions is to discriminate against unbound proteins rather than to increase the affinity for any particular target protein.




This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
I. Andre, T. Kesvatera, B. Jonsson, and S. Linse
Salt Enhances Calmodulin-Target Interaction
Biophys. J., April 15, 2006; 90(8): 2903 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Lindman, W.-F. Xue, O. Szczepankiewicz, M. C. Bauer, H. Nilsson, and S. Linse
Salting the Charged Surface: pH and Salt Dependence of Protein G B1 Stability
Biophys. J., April 15, 2006; 90(8): 2911 - 2921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH SEARCH RESULT
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.